Intent
The request says what is changing.
PRism / Pull request intelligence
Proof is the
product.
A rigorous review surface for changes that move too quickly to trust on instinct. PRism brings intent, impact, coverage, and line-level evidence into one brief.
Read-only access. Your code is never executed or posted back to GitHub.
SYNTHETIC EXAMPLE / REVIEW BRIEFPR #248
Evidence gate
Retry can charge an order twice
The retry path calls the gateway before it checks whether the prior attempt completed.
84
await gateway.capture(order.total)billing/charge.py:84citation matched
See the review process, end to end.
Follow a pull request from GitHub connection through verified findings and cited evidence.
Read the transcript
A code review should do more than summarize a pull request. It should show what changed, why it matters, and the evidence behind each conclusion.
This is PRism, an evidence-backed review workspace that connects intent, impact, coverage, and line-level proof in one place.
Connect GitHub, select a repository and pull request, then start an analysis. PRism checks the change through a series of focused review steps.
As the review runs, each check builds toward a useful answer: what changed, where it could break, and which claims still need verification.
The findings register separates verified issues from unverified claims. Each finding includes severity and supporting evidence, so reviewers can follow the reasoning.
Open the diff to inspect the exact lines behind a finding. Coverage and test evidence show what was exercised, and where confidence is still limited.
Dependency checks can flag assumptions the repository cannot prove, keeping those items visible instead of presenting them as confirmed.
PRism also shows the review method: how facts are collected, how tests run, and how every citation is traced back to the change.
The result is a review someone else can verify, follow, and act on, with the proof kept alongside the conclusion.
Download transcriptGood review is not a summary. It is a trail someone else can follow.
↓A review with a chain of custody
Each conclusion has somewhere to stand.
Impact
Dependencies show what else moves.
Coverage
Tests are tied to the PR head.
Gate
Every cited claim is checked.
Try the evidence trail
Inspect the reason,
not just the result.
Choose a layer of the review to see the exact kind of evidence it gives a reviewer.
Evidence / Intent
The request says what is changing.
sourcePR description
review stateready for verification
How it works
Start with the change. End with a defensible brief.
Connect your read-only GitHub App
Select the pull request
Compute facts before model reasoning
Inspect verified findings in context
Why PRism
A review tool, not a text generator.
CapabilityGeneric AI summaryPRism
Cites changed linesSometimesVerified
Connects dependency factsRarelyYes
Preserves missing coverageOften unclearExplicitly unknown
Keeps evidence beside findingUsually separateBuilt in
No false confidence
Unknown is a valid answer.
When coverage cannot be connected to the exact commit, PRism preserves that uncertainty instead of manufacturing a claim.
A better review handoff
Keep the fact beside the finding.
Every verified finding includes its file, changed line, and evidence path. The reviewer stays in control.
Explore the evidence gate →The details
Questions a serious review tool should answer.
No. PRism reads the pull request diff and related GitHub metadata; it does not execute submitted code.
Built for large and AI-generated changes